All marks that are allocated by module coordinators are provisional as 20% of the scripts are subjectyed to moderation and moderators may adjust marks.

The quality of some assignments are a source of bother (see some of the moderators'comments below).  I urge you to refer to the Learner Guide once again and comply with the requirements.

1. "Although the candidate has provided a neat and technically correct submission, it lacks analytical as well as critical assessment. There is a lack of inferences from theory and practice."

2. "The candidate has merely 'cut and paste' several sources. The effort does not reflect any critical nor analytical assessment. Technically, it is also unacceptable. Inadequate number of sources consulted."
3. "The candidate has provided inadequate information and discussion.  Distinct lack of critical analysis and assessment.  No insight nor application of practice to theory."

4. "Distinct lack of acknowledgement of sources. Only websites utilised. There is no bibliography. Also, a lack of critical analysis and assessment."

5. "Many sections of the document lack acknowledgement of sources. No cover page. Headings unnumbered in table of contents and the document itself. Many sections are a mere 'cut and paste'. Lack of critical analysis and assessement."

6. "Many sections of the effort lack acknowledgement of sources. Lack of critical analysis and assessment. Bibliography is technically incorrect."